home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- >From: cindy@solan10.solan.unit.no (Cynthia Kandolf)
- Subject: Return of the US Language UL
- Message-ID: <CINDY.92Jul12184324@solan10.solan.unit.no>
- Date: 12 Jul 92 16:43:24 GMT
- Sender: news@ugle.unit.no (NetNews Administrator)
- Distribution: alt
- Organization: /home/ludviga/cindy/.organization
- Lines: 52
-
- Those of you who have been around here for longer than you care
- to admit (like me) may remember the time someone brought up a legend
- about German having narrowly missed becoming the official language of
- the United States. This is a common story, and the usual cap to it
- is that Congress voted - by a majority of one vote - to make English
- the official language of the US, this significantly altering the
- course of development in the US textbook publishing industry.
-
- The story is false. Matter of fact, the US at present does not have
- an "official" language in the sense of a language declared by law to
- have special status; English is merely the de facto standard.
- There _was_ indeed some discussion about which language to adapt,
- with some strong seperatists arguing that English was the language
- of the "enemy". However, there were no cliff-hangers as suggested
- by the legend mentioned above; the strong seperatists were a minority
- group, and it was pretty clear from the start that most people
- considered changing from English to be too much trouble. All this
- junk was discussed the last time around, but i wanted to summarize it
- for those who weren't with us then.
-
- The reason for bringing this up is that i have found an incident that
- may be the source of this UL. (Drum roll.) My source is the
- _Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language_, by David Crystal, published
- by the Cambridge University Press, (c)1987. In the interest of
- completeness, ISBN 0 521 26438 3.
-
- from page 365:
-
- _A planning myth_
-
- Probably the best-known myth in the history of language planning is
- the story that German nearly became the national language of the US in
- the 18th century, losing to English by only one vote in the
- legislature (the "Muhlenberg" legend). In fact, all that was involved
- was a request, made by a group of Virginia Germans, to have certain
- laws issued in German _as well as_ in Englih. The proposal was
- rejected by one vote, apparently cast by a German-speaking Lutheran
- clergyman, Frederick Muhlenberg (1750-1801). But the general status
- of English as the majority language was never in doubt. (After S.B.
- Heath and F. Mandabach, 1983.)
-
- [End quote]
-
- Just to show that i did my homework, the paper referred to is:
- Heath, S.B., and Mandabach, F. 1983. Language status decisions and
- the law in the United States. In J. Cobarrubias and J.A. Fishman
- (eds.), _Progress in language planning: international perspectives_
- (Berlin: Mouton), 87-105.
-
- -Cindy Kandolf
- cindy@solan.unit.no
- Trondheim, Norway
-
-
-